QuestionAnswered step-by-stepPurpose NR531 W7 Executive Summary Guidelines and Rubric The…Purpose NR531 W7 Executive Summary Guidelines and RubricThe purposes of this assignment are to: a) identify and articulate the results of a Magnet report received from the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) for Saint Louis Medical Center (SLMC). You, the nurse director, will present your findings to the SLMC board of directors, in an executive summary format (CO 2, 3), b) articulate and include the key components of an executive summary in your report (CO 5), and c) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your assignment (CO 4).NOTE: As the nurse executive of SLMC, you may choose one item from any of the following Magnet Model Components to discuss and present to the SLMC board of directors, in your executive summary. There is no written report of a Magnet Survey; you have the flexibility to choose what you would like to discuss in this assignment. For example, you may state in your report that your Magnet model component is structural empowerment and you wish to implement a new nurse model since the results of your Magnet report were not acceptable in this area.Please view the following Magnet Model Components (Links to an external site.):Transformational LeadershipStructural EmpowermentExemplary Professional PracticeNew Knowledge, Innovations & ImprovementsEmpirical OutcomesCourse Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:(CO2) Synthesize management and leadership theories with a caring, holistic, collaborative approach in preparation of nurse administrator roles: utilizing critical thinking, communication skills and therapeutic intervention strategies, of the professional role related to health outcomes. (POs 2, 5).(CO3) Compare and contrast the effect of organizational structures, e.g. organizational charts, standards, resources, philosophy, procedures, and culture on work processes and organizational and patient outcomes; utilizing critical thinking, interprofessional collaboration, communication skills and strategies of the professional role. (POs 1, 2)(CO4) Apply the use of research in the evaluation of healthcare outcomes; utilizing critical thinking skills, and interprofessional research strategies. (PO 4)(CO5) Examine effective verbal and written communication; utilizing communication skills of the professional role to promote and improve quality and safety in healthcare. (POs 1, 2, 5)Due Date Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:Monday = 10% of total possible point reductionTuesday = 20% of total possible point reductionWednesday = 30% of total possible point reductionIf the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:Monday = 10% of total possible point reductionTuesday = 20% of total possible point reductionWednesday = 30% of total possible point reductionTotal Points Possible: 225 Requirements This paper will be graded on quality of paper information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”.Submit to the appropriate assignment area by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Discussion topic.The length of the paper is to be no greater than three (3) pages, excluding title page and reference page.APA format, using most current edition, is required for this assignment, including a title and reference pages. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See the APA manual sixth edition for details. Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment:Include introduction (do not label as a heading in APA format)Issue and Magnet Model Component IdentifiedKey Components of Executive SummarySupporting EvidenceConclusionPreparing the Paper Note: Please use the resources in your Roussel textbook, Chapter 15, to assist with how to write an executive summary format to articulate the results of your Magnet report from ANCC.Clearly introduce your executive summary in the introduction paragraph. Include a sentence that states the purpose of your assignment.Clearly identify and articulate the issue and component from the Magnet model to be communicated to the board of directors at SLMC by you, the nurse executive. Discuss how your choice may affect your healthcare environment and transform healthcare.Key components of an executive summary format, related to the results of the Magnet report, should be included and clearly articulated. (Examples are in your textbook or you may search for them on the web). Include in your executive summary how this assignment relates to the Person-centred Framework by McCormack and McCance (2017).Include of a minimum of three sources of scholarly, empirical evidence to support the issue to be communicated.Provide concluding statements that should summarize your overall assignment content.The paper will be no longer than three pages maximum, excluding title and reference page(s).Note: There are several formats of an executive summary in your text or on the internet. As the nurse executive, you may choose which style you prefer.Title and reference page(s) must be in APA format using the sixth edition manual.Use 12 Times New Roman font and one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.Note: After submitting your assignment to the Week 7 assignment area, please also upload your completed assignment to the Week 8 designated threaded discussion to share with your peers.Rubric Week 7: Executive Summary Rubric (MAY19) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction 30 ptsIntroduction introduces your executive summary and purpose clearly. 26 ptsIntroduction introduces your executive summary with minor lack of clarity or elements. 24 ptsIntroduction of executive summary lacks occasional important element or specificity. 11 ptsIntroduction of executive summary has multiple instances of inaccuracies. 0 ptsIntroduction of executive summary is not present. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIssue and Magnet Model Component 30 ptsIdentification of issue and Magnet model component to be communicated to the board of directors is articulated clearly with no inaccuracy. 26 ptsIdentification of issue and Magnet model component to be communicated to the board of directors is articulated with rare inaccuracy. 24 ptsIdentification of issue and Magnet model component to be communicated to the board of directors lacks occasional important elements or specificity. 11 ptsIdentification of issue and Magnet model component to be communicated to the board of directors has multiple instances of inaccuracies. 0 ptsIdentification of issue and Magnet model component to be communicated to the board of directors is not present. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Components 80 ptsKey components of executive summary are included and clearly articulated 70 ptsKey components of executive summary are articulated with rare inaccuracy. 66 ptsKey components of executive summary lack occasional important element or specificity 30 ptsKey components of executive summary have multiple instances of inaccuracies. 0 ptsKey components of executive summary are not present. 80 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence 30 ptsAt least three empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your issue are included. 26 ptsEmpirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your issue are clearly critiqued and have rare inaccuracy; or only two sources included. 24 ptsEmpirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your issue lack occasional important element or specificity; or less than two sources included. 11 ptsEmpirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your issue have multiple instances of inaccuracies. 0 ptsEmpirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your issue are not present. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 30 ptsConcluding statements summarizing content are present and accurate. 26 ptsConcluding statements summarizing content are present with rare inaccuracy or missing elements. 24 ptsConcluding statements summarizing content lack occasional important element or specificity. 11 ptsConcluding statements summarizing content has multiple instances of inaccuracies. 0 ptsConcluding statements summarizing content are missing. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText, title page, and references are consistent with APA format 10 ptsText, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. 9 ptsText, title page, and references are consistent with APA format, with two to four exceptions. 8 ptsThere are five to seven APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages. 4 ptsThere are eight to nine APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages 0 ptsThere are more than 10 APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas and information from other sources are cited correctly 10 ptsIdeas and information from other sources are cited correctly. 9 ptsIdeas and information from other sources are cited correctly, with two to four exceptions. 8 ptsIdeas and information from other sources are cited with five to seven errors. 4 ptsIdeas and information from other sources are cited with eight to nine errors. 0 ptsIdeas and information from other sources are cited with more than 10 errors. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed 5 ptsRules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. 4 ptsRules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed, with two to four exceptions. 3 ptsRules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, with five to seven exceptions. 2 ptsRules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, with eight to nine exceptions. 0 ptsRules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed with more than 10 exceptions. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions 0 pts0 pts lost – submission met deadline 0 ptsStudent does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days) 0 pts Total Points: 225Health ScienceScienceNursingNR 531Share Question